Dr. Johnson announced a lifelong theme when, at age sixteen, he wrote “An Ode on Friendship,” which begins: “Friendship, peculiar gift of heav’n, / The noble mind’s delight and pride, / To men and angels only giv’n, / To all the lower world deny’d.” This suggests there’s nothing casual about friendship. It’s a privileged, dignified state: “When virtues kindred virtues meet.” We take friendship (and everything else) more casually: “You know, I like to be around the guy. He’s funny.” We think of it as fondness and compatibility short of romance, though one can certainly befriend a lover. The more you try to define and taxonomize degrees of friendship, the slipperier it becomes.
Johnson’s first
major work, “Life of Mr Richard Savage” (1744), is largely the chronicle of a
friendship. In his Dictionary (1755),
he formulates six definitions of friend, the first being “one joined to another
in mutual benevolence and intimacy: opposed to foe or enemy.” A quarter-century
later, on October 27, 1750, dedicated a Rambler
essay to the subject. This is thirteen years before he met Boswell and
initiated the best-known, most documented friendship in history. As usual, Johnson
is a realist:
“So many
qualities are indeed requisite to the possibility of friendship, and so many
accidents must concur to its rise and continuance, that the greatest part of
mankind content themselves without it, and supply its place as they can, with
interest and dependence [sic].”
That final,
qualifying phrase I take to mean something like superficial commonality and
necessity, respectively. In the first case, the attraction may be soccer or The Sopranos, but it seldom goes deeper. In
the latter, one becomes dependent on the aid of another. Such a relationship is
likely benevolent, rooted in compassion and a good heart, but it isn’t necessarily
friendship. Because of geography, many of my friendships are remote, dependent
on email, texts and the telephone. I’ve lived in five states and not in Ohio,
my birthplace, since 1983. My closest friend in Houston and I share some “interests”
in the Johnsonian sense, mostly kids and music. But he’s not a reader. He’s an
enthusiastic surfer and fisherman. I’m neither. And yet we converse almost daily,
we make each other laugh and we are reliable. Friendship is multiform and remains
another baffling thing humans do. More realism from Johnson’s Rambler essay:
“He cannot properly be chosen for a friend, whose kindness is exhaled by his own warmth, or frozen by the first blast of slander; he cannot be a useful counsellor, who will hear no opinion but his own; he will not much invite confidence whose principal maxim is to suspect; nor can the candour and frankness of that man be much esteemed, who spreads his arms to humankind, and makes every man, without distinction, a denizen of his bosom.”
2 comments:
I remember my father telling me once that some people will be "friends" with you as long as *you* do all the work to keep the "friendship" going. If you talk on the phone, it's because *you* called *him.* If you get together, it's because *you* set it up, not *him.* I think he may have been speaking from experience.
Happy 70th birthday, by the way.
Surely interest to Johnson means benefit or advantage, or possibly influence?
Post a Comment