I’ve always thought the truest act of criticism was to read a writer attentively, applying a degree of respectful concentration proportionate to what the writer devoted to the work’s creation. I still believe that but there’s an act of homage even more potent but denied most readers: the selection and editing of texts. The model here, I suppose, is Housman and his five-volume edition of the Astronomica of Manilius.
More
recently, the poet R.L. Barth performed a service for readers by editing The Selected Poems of Yvor Winters
(1999) and The Selected Letters of Yvor
Winters (2000), both published by Ohio University Press/Swallow Press. Without
those volumes, or the Library of America edition of Winters’ poems edited in
2003 by his former student, Thom Gunn, the work of a major American poet might
be unavailable. Winters is as great and unfashionable a poet and critic as can
be imagined today. With reasonable certainty I can assume that few academics
have read his work. The last book devoted to Winters was published in 1986, and
we still have no biography.
In 1998, the
journal Hellas devoted an issue to the
poet John Finlay (1941-91), a great admirer of Winters. Barth was Finlay’s
first publisher, bringing out The Wide Porch,
and Other Poems in 1984. Barth contributed a poem to the Festschrift, “To Yvor Winters, While
Editing His Selected Poems”:
“What strikes
me now most deeply is your trust.
Hardheaded,
realistic, past surprise,
You turned a
withering, harsh verse on lies,
Betrayed
ideals, subverted justice, lust,
And scourged
the statesman, scholar, poet, fool.
But even
through the anger you were cool
“In your
assurance there were absolutes, by
However
mindlessly ignored; the true
Was always
just that, true; and some men grew
In hard-won
wisdom which no Hell confutes.
Somehow such
men, though few in number, would
Both keep
alive and perpetuate the Good.
“Now you are
dead these thirty years, and I,
Though none
admires you more, am cynical
And
unregenerate, product of all
The types
you scorned, and say the great must die.
Attempting
to refocus oversight,
I wait, Maestro,
knowing which one is right.”
Like Henry
James, Winters is “The Master.” Both hold writers and readers to
uncompromisingly high standards, by “withering, harsh” dismissals of the
mediocre and by the rigor of their work. In a letter, Winters says he tends
toward “a predisposition on behalf of the hard, the brave, the reticent, and
the stoical.” In an autobiographical piece collected in The Occasions of Poetry (1999), Thom Gunn writes:
“He was a
man of great personal warmth with a deeper love for poetry than I have ever met
in anybody else. The love was behind his increasingly strict conception of what
a poem should and should not be. It would have seemed to him an insult to the
poem that it could be used as a gymnasium for the ego.”
A
contemporary poet, critic and – surprise!
– academic has published "Stay Awake:
Death, Catholicism, and Yvor Winters" in The Catholic World Reporter. James
Matthew Wilson writes:
“In
Winters’s literary criticism, he repeatedly praised Saint Thomas Aquinas as
among the greatest of thinkers. He held up Aquinas as the antithesis to such
unsatisfactory modern thinkers as Henry Adams, whose irrationalism, relativism,
and determinism would, if true, make it impossible for human beings to take
intellectual and moral responsibility for their lives.”
No comments:
Post a Comment