In 1966, when Zbigniew Herbert was asked to submit a poem to a symposium in Berlin, for subsequent publication in an anthology, he chose “Why the Classics” (trans. Peter Dale Scott and Czesław Miłosz), which concludes:
“if art for
its subject
will have a
broken jar
a small
broken soul
with a great
self-pity
“what will
remain after us
will it be
lovers' weeping
in a small
dirty hotel
when
wall-paper dawns”
Herbert recalls
Thucydides, who in 423 B.C. was an Athenian general during the Second
Peloponnesian War. The Greek arrived too late to prevent the capture of Amphipolis
by the Spartans, and later admitted his failure in his history of that war. In
contrast, Herbert claims, more recent generals “whine on their knees before
posterity” and blame others for their failures. In a brief commentary on the
poem written in 1966 and included in his Collected
Prose 1948-1998 (trans. Alissa Valles, Ecco, 2010), Herbert outlines the
poem’s three-part structure in refreshingly explicit terms:
“In the
first part, it speaks of an event taken from the work of a classical author. It
is, as it were, a note on my reading. In the second part I transfer the event
to contemporary times to elicit a tension, a clash, to reveal an essential
difference in attitude and behavior. Finally the conclusion contains a
conclusion or moral, and also transposes the problem from the sphere of history
to the sphere of art.”
Herbert is
crisp and matter-of-fact, not indulging in woozy mystification or self-congratulation,
as we might expect in other poets. As to the “sphere of art,” he writes:
“You don’t
have to be a great expert on contemporary literature to notice its
characteristic feature—the eruption of despair and unbelief. All the fundamental
values of European culture have been drawn into
question. Thousands of novels, plays, and epic poems speak of an inevitable
annihilation, of life’s meaninglessness, the absurdity of human existence.”
Herbert
tells us that what he “tried to attack in my poem” is the defeatist,
inward-turning attitude, the “black tone,”
of so many writers (and generals). “Beyond the artist’s reach,” he writes, “a
world unfolds—difficult, dark, but real. One should not lose the faith that it
can be captured in words, that justice can be rendered it.” So much
contemporary poetry and fiction has lost its nerve and collapsed into narcissism.
Herbert continues, rather stirringly:
“Very early
on, near the beginning of my writing life, I came to believe that I had to
seize on some object outside of literature. Writing as a stylistic exercise
seemed barren to me. Poetry as the art of the word made me yawn. I also
understood that I couldn’t sustain myself very long on the poems of others. I
had to go out from myself and literature, look around in the world and lay hold
of other spheres of reality.”
No comments:
Post a Comment