Thomas Carper takes the epigraph to “The Beauty of Poetry” from Chapter X of George Santayana’s Interpretations of Poetry and Religion (1900):
“I have
heard it maintained by a critic of relative authority that the beauty of poetry
consists entirely in the frequent utterance of the sound of' ‘j’ and ‘sh,’ and
the consequent copious flow of saliva in the mouth.”
Santayana is
having some droll fun here. Theories about language, specifically poetry, are
often laughable. All I have to hear is the word “poetics” and I run for the exit.
Santayana follows the sentence above with this: “But even if saliva is not the
whole essence of poetry . . .” Carper’s sonnet (in the August 1986 issue of Poetry) takes it from there:
“I have
heard a respectable critic say,
And heard
his judgment greeted with a hush,
That
frequent utterance of the sound of ‘j’
And ‘sh’ in
poems shall get our glands to gush
A joyful
moisture, and inspire a rush
Of
admiration that will keep alive a
Sonnet for a
century. But tush,
It surely
will not be shots of saliva
That let a
shabby jingling verse survive a
Scrutiny
when there’s no thought to convey.
And did our
special poets just contrive a
Kind of
canning that can stash away
Small jars
of juice we open and send sloshing
Into our
mouths? Maybe the critic’s joshing.”
Carper
neatly punctures the silliness of a crackpot idea. Spit is not wit.
No comments:
Post a Comment