To some writers we feel an unbudgeable loyalty that defies critical understanding and even good taste. I can’t defend my love of Sherwood Anderson’s stories and no longer feel the need to do so. At some point a reader gives up trying to impress others with his sophistication, accepts his eccentricities of taste and resolves to enjoy himself with books the tastemakers frown upon. Such are the letters and poems of William Cowper (1731-1800). My Everyman’s Library edition of his Poems (1931) is readily reachable on the shelf closest to my desk, next to E.A. Robinson, a much greater poet who once wrote:
“Something
tells me that [Cowper] is not, and never will be, one of the really great
poets, although in occasional passages he is well nigh unsurpassable. There is
much of the sandy desert in his work, but still it is comfortable traveling.
The green and glorious places that come every little while are all the brighter
for the comparative barrenness around them.”
Which
likewise describes some of Robinson’s own later work. In 2006, the poet W.S. Di
Piero published a prose selection, “Semba!: A Notebook,” including a brief passage
about Cowper:
“William
Cowper cannily and amicably conceals his secret suicidal melancholia in the flowering
shrubs of his letters, which craft a rather wholesome, amiable personality, but
he admits to ‘[putting] on an air of cheerfulness and vivacity to which I am in
reality a stranger.’ It was ‘the arduous task of being merry by force. . . . Despair
made amusements necessary, and I found poetry the most agreeable amusement.’ He
lived with the unwanted companion and made himself a good one. His pain, his
madness, was the raised, rough grain of his sense of failure in belief, in life
as devotion. To feel unworthy of God is, in derangement, to be convinced of
being unworthy of life.”
Part of the
drama of reading Cowper’s letters is observing him alternately confessing and
concealing his periodically suicidal depression. His sense of wonder and
delight is genuine but sometimes reads like self-administered therapy. Here he is on May
3, 1780, writing to his friend the Rev. John Newton and making piety playful:
“I delight
in baubles, and know them to be so; for rested in, and viewed without a
reference to their author, what is the Earth, what are the planets, what is the
sun itself, but a bauble? Better for a man never to have seen them, or to see
them with the eyes of a brute, stupid and unconscious of what he beholds, than
not to be able to say, `The maker of all these wonders is my friend!’ Their
eyes have never been opened, to see that they are trifles; mine have been, and
will be till they are closed for ever.”
Here is
Cowper writing to another friend, the Rev. Robert Unwin, on Jan. 17, 1782:
“To make
verse speak the language of prose, without being prosaic, to marshal the words
of it in such an order as they might naturally take in falling from the lips of
an extemporary speaker, yet without meanness, harmoniously, and without seeming
to displace a single syllable for the sake of rhyme, is one of the most arduous
tasks a poet can undertake.”
In a letter
to Unwin, always his stalwart friend, written on April Fool’s Day in 1782, shortly
after publishing his first volume of verse, Cowper thanks him for publicizing
the publication: “I could not have found a better trumpeter.” When not insane,
Cowper was the wittiest and most gracious of men. He never says “thank you”
when a more baroque expression of gratitude is handy. Two sentences later, and
extending the musical metaphor, Cowper writes:
“Methinks I
see you with the long tube at your mouth, proclaiming to your numerous
connections my poetical merits and at proper intervals levelling it at Olney,
and pouring into my ear the welcome sound of their approbation. I need not
encourage you to proceed, your breath will never fail in such a cause; and thus
encouraged, I myself perhaps may proceed also, and when the versifying fit
returns produce another volume.”
The same man
in his poem “Lines Written During a Period of Insanity,” can write: “I, fed
with judgment, in a fleshy tomb am / Buried above ground.”
1 comment:
Who would I defend against all comers, whatever crushing critical blows might be landed against them? Philip K. Dick (our host's bête noire), James Jones, Thomas Lovell Beddoes. It's hard to say why - maybe there are some admittedly lesser writers who still can scratch some itch that greater ones just can't reach.
Post a Comment