“The war had taken his innocence and replaced it with something else. That something – ‘the destined anguish’ - revealed itself gradually and became a presence in his poetry for the rest of his life.”
Margi
Blunden, speaking in 2014, is remembering her father, the poet and Great War
veteran Edmund Blunden (1896-1974). The quoted phrase – “the destined anguish” –
is taken from the final page of her father’s memoir, Undertones of War (1928), and refers to the loss of innocence that will
“poison” the remainder of his postwar life. Margi refers to the “Feast of Five,”
a photograph of her father and four of his childhood friends taken shortly
before the Battle of Passchendaele. Two would be killed the following month and
a third would take his own life in 1924. Blunden’s daughter writes:
“I think this photo expresses so much about the war and its truth. The war seeped in. It became an unwelcome companion. It disturbed. It attached itself. It turned and churned the inner world of those who landed in its clutches. It shaped a demon in the psyche which had to be met, fought with and tamed. The irony is that it couldn’t be tamed. How do you forget the eyeball under the duckboard, the boots with a pair of feet in them, the deaths of your friends, the wild destruction of the earth?”
At age
nineteen, Blunden was commissioned a second lieutenant in the Royal Sussex
Regiment. He served for almost two years on the Western Front, took part in the
engagements at Ypres and the Somme, and was awarded the Military Cross. He describes
the Somme battlefield as “this satire in iron brown and field grey.” It is a “gluey morass . .
. cocoon of trenches in which mud, and death, and life were much the
same thing . . . the deep dugouts . . . were cancerous with torn
bodies.” Blunden refers to “the long finger of war,” suggesting the battle
raged long after the Armistice. In a late poem, “Ancre Sunshine” (1966), he
writes:
“The railway
trains went by, and dreamily
I thought of
them as planets in their course,
Thought
bound perhaps for Arras, how would we
Have
wondered once if through the furious force
Murdering
our world one of these same had come,
Friendly and
sensible – ‘the war’s over chum.'”
In his 1934 essay collection, The Mind’s Eye, Blunden writes of
the first day of the Battle of the Somme (July 1, 1916), which would rage for four
and a half months:
“By the end
of the day, both sides had seen, in a sad scrawl of broken earth and murdered
men, the answer to the question. No road. No thoroughfare. Neither race had
won, nor could win, the War. The war had won, and would go on winning.”
On that first day, the British suffered 57,470 casualties, including 19,240 killed. The French Sixth Army had 1,590 casualties and the German 2nd Army between 10,000 and 12,000 losses.
The
Armistice was signed on this date, November 11, in 1918. Five years later, on
November 11, 1923, Adolf Hitler was arrested for his part in the Beer Hall
Putsch in Munich, leading eventually to the resumption of the world war in 1939.
[Margi
Blunden spoke during the British First World War Poetry event held at the
University of Oxford in April 2014. Her talk was published later that year in
the journal Use of English.]
3 comments:
I think of Audie Murphy, a quiet young man plucked away from his rural Texas home by war, an event which revealed something that he would otherwise never have known: that he had a genius for killing. He was honored for it, but the end of the war made it clear that all of his medals were, in effect, posthumous; though he walked around above ground for another quarter century, he hadn't returned home alive from the battlefield. Audie Murphy was dead and just waiting for his body to catch up.
How many like him do we pass in the streets every day? What must they think when they hear a quick and callow "Thank you for your service"?
"Thank you for your service" seems to me a simple, direct acknowledgement, in the same way that "I'm sorry for your loss" is an appropriate way to respond to a death.
The impulse to say thank you is commendable, no argument. I just think we should understand that, for some people, the very nature of their service renders them unable to accept the thanks.
Post a Comment