St. Augustine observes of St. Ambrose in Book VI, Chapter 3 of his Confessions:
“When he was
reading, his eyes ran over the page and his heart perceived the sense, but his
voice and tongue were silent. . . . Very often when we were there, we saw him
silently reading and never otherwise.”
Scholars
disagree: Was Ambrose, the Bishop of Milan, an eccentric or pioneer? Did others
in the fourth and fifth centuries not read silently? Augustine found it sufficiently
noteworthy to point out Ambrose’s peculiar manner of reading: “Whatever motive
he had for his habit, this man had a good reason for what he did.” Did
Augustine ever ask Ambrose to explain himself?
After millennia
of silent reading, it seems like the “natural” thing to do. Reading aloud is
conventionally reserved for young children not yet able to read on their own,
or for special cases. It’s a “performance,” not unlike acting, especially if
you add accents and sound effects. Even when alone in the house, many of us
would feel self-conscious reading Daniel
Deronda aloud to the empty rooms. Reading is so interior an act, so
intimate an engagement with a text, that it would seem almost indecent to broadcast
it.
Deborah
Warren takes Ambrose’s peculiar act and Augustine’s account of it as the
premise for her poem “Silent Reading” (Zero Meridian: Poems, 2004):
“Ambrose
read silently, astonishing
those who
watched and pressed around him spellbound,
never having
heard of such a thing:
Romans didn’t
read except aloud.
And here was
Ambrose who, without a sound,
swallowed
the hidden words before a crowd
so
thunderstruck you’d think the earth had stopped --
“And
twitching an instant at the poles, it had.
It leaned on
its axis to read the constellations
printed in
all the volumes of the sky
and shifted
its shoulder, riffling the ocean's pages,
the way it
does when it’s stunned by something new,
and then
resumed its spinning while the Romans
stood there
and stared at silence, silent too.”
Warren hints
that Ambrose’s practice was “earth-shaking.” Perhaps it helped make possible the
modern understanding of our discrete interior lives.
[The Augustine passage is quoted from Henry Chadwick’s translation of Confessions (Oxford University Press, 2008). In a footnote to the passage, Chadwick writes: “In antiquity silent reading was uncommon, not unknown.”]
3 comments:
Reading poetry aloud often seems to enhance the experience. Some folks like to read to each other at times. And reading aloud a foreign language also seems to help with advancing one's knowledge. Finally, some of us still enjoy reading to children or grandchildren.
Often the reading was let to an slave.
I recall somewhere Nabokov mentions with disdain that someone moves his or her lips while otherwise silently reading poetry, making it clear that he considers this something like the ultimate sign of low intelligence.
Post a Comment