A friend tells me he is boycotting a favorite bookstore because, as he writes, “someone posted a fair-sized sign on the store’s ‘Community Board’ reading, ‘From The River to the Sea, Palestine Shall Be Free.’” There’s a naïvely childish part of me that finds the obscenity especially offensive because a bookstore patron or employee -- a reader of books! -- would post it. Readers should know better. They know history and have educated themselves ethically. They have a moral sense, yes? Of course not. My friend writes:
“That by now
familiar rallying cry constitutes a call for the elimination of Israel as a
Jewish state and, by implication, for the judenrein-ization
of the country. I’m mindful of the possibility
that the store didn’t post the sign and even disapproves of it (though the
clerk didn’t disavow it when I registered a protest). The store may instead be
afraid to remove the sign, fearing a hostile reaction from the city’s
boisterous pro-Palestinian groups. Whatever the case, the sign still hangs
there, a conspicuous affront to the store’s Jewish customers.”
And to the rest of us who claim to possess a rudimentary moral and historical sense. You needn’t be Jewish to find the recent metastasizing of anti-Semitism abhorrent. We can try to be understanding and blame Jew-hatred on historical ignorance and the ongoing corruption of public education. I almost called it a “revival” of anti-Semitism but the hatred has always been there, like a bacillus resistant to antibiotics.
I suggest
Jews and non-Jews alike read Isaac Bashevis Singer’s Writings on Yiddish and Yiddishkayt: The War Years, 1939-1945 (trans.
David Stromberg, White Goat Press, 2023). The great short story writer left
Poland in 1935 and settled in New York City, where he wrote for the
Yiddish-language Jewish Daily Forward. Stromberg
selects from the columns Singer produced during World War II. One of them,
published on September 7, 1941, is titled “Jews Would Oppose Nazis Even If
Fascists and Hitlerites Were Not Antisemites”:
“There was a
time when Hitler’s antisemitism wasn’t taken very seriously, just as his
political program, threats against ethnic groups, and power over the German
people were not taken seriously. Hitler was not the first antisemite and will
not be the last. As long as Hitler did not put words into action, there was no reason
for anyone to take what he said seriously. . . . When Hitler says that the existence of the
Jews is a personal insult to him, he’s not pulling it out of thin air.”
Read that again,
substituting Hamas and its cheerleaders, in the U.S. and elsewhere, for each
mention of Hitler.
3 comments:
It is also another dreary step on the long march that it taking us into a world where there is no space that will be free from hectoring, indoctrination, sloganeering, advertising etc. When I pump gas now, I'm subjected to an endless stream of this kind of garbage emanating from the pump itself (TikTok videos, for Chrissake!); we are to be permitted no place where we can think our own thoughts.
PHilip K. Dick (one of your favorites, Patrick!) envisioned a world (in his 1964 novel The Simulacra, I think) where people are constantly followed around by bio-engineered advertisements that buzz into people's ears, whether they want it or not; people vainly slap at them like annoying insects. I feel like we're there.
Amen to that, Thomas Parker. And the human slaughter goes on and on. Lex talionis--an eye for an eye--is blinding us all.
See https://medium.com/@vardi/us-campus-antisemitism-how-did-we-get-here-draft-for-comments-25d16d8d2d2d
Moshe Vardi
Post a Comment