“I delight sensually in Time, in its stuff and spread, in the fall of its folds, in the very impalpability of its grayish gauze, in the coolness of its continuum.”
You may recognize the
almost overripe prose. Ingesting so rich a diet too early in life can spoil one
for plainer fare. It’s a sentence I underlined on Page 537 in Ada or Ardor: A Family Chronicle, the Nabokov novel I bought ($8.95) shortly after its
publication on May 5, 1969. It’s a book I love almost as much for the memory of
my teenage infatuation as for its teasing, alliterative, game-playing, occasionally
self-indulgent density.
Further down the same
page, beside Nabokov’s mention of “Aurelius Augustinus,” I helpfully wrote “St.
Augustine.” At the bottom and continuing onto the next page I underlined this
passage: “Time is rhythm: the insect rhythm of a warm humid night, brain
ripple, breathing, the drum in my temple—these are our faithful timekeepers;
and reason corrects the feverish beat.”
I can’t say with certainty
but Nabokov’s concern with Time probably influenced my own preoccupation with
Time’s passage and efforts to recover the past. Within a few years I would read
one of Nabokov’s rare, acknowledged masters, Marcel Proust, and that reinforced
my devotion to memory. Scattered throughout my fifty-six-year-old copy of Ada
are other underlinings and annotations that impressed my younger self, including
this on Page 539:
“Pure Time, Perceptual
Time, Tangible Time, Time free of content, context, and running commentary—this
is my time and theme. All the rest is numerical symbol or some aspect of Space.
The texture of Space is not that of Time, and the piebald four-dimensional
sport bred by relativists is a quadruped with one leg replaced by the ghost of
a leg. My time is also Motionless Time (we shall presently dispose of ‘flowing’
time, water-clock time, water-closet time).”
No comments:
Post a Comment