A longtime reader and fellow blogger shares with me a taste for aphoristic writing, prose that is concise, of course, but also dense with meaning and often packing a sting. Aphorisms can be marketed as such but often they appear as a functional part of a larger text. George Eliot is especially good at this, as is Joseph Conrad. Read Daniel Deronda or Nostromo with pithy declarations in mind and you can fill a modest-sized commonplace book. If you don’t like “aphorism,” think maxim, apothegm, proverb, adage, bromide or aperçu.
Careful readers, as we get
older, lose tolerance for clumsy, excess verbiage. Time is short. A well-crafted
aphorism, a mere handful of words, contains more thought-matter than most
novels. I choose “matter” purposely. A good aphorism seems to confirm
Einstein’s notion that matter is energy. I think of aphorisms lying on the
page, coiled to strike when released by the reader. They are not reasoned
arguments.
Some people are offended
by the casual stridency and truth-telling associated with aphoristic writing. Aphorisms
are often a reproach to self-delusion and reveal a truth without compromise or
qualification. An aphorism is the writerly opposite of popular political
discourse, which aims to be “inclusive” and say nothing that might displease
its intended audience. An aphorism respects the truth, not the reader. In his
foreword to The Viking Book of Aphorisms (1962), W.H. Auden (a gifted
aphorist himself) says an aphorism must “convince every reader that it is
either universally true or true of every member of the class to which it
refers, irrespective of the reader’s convictions.” My friend the late D.G.
Myers loved the only aphorism I ever intentionally composed: “Politics has
destroyed more writers than vodka.”
Elias Canetti (1905-94) is
a deft coiner of aphorisms, even in his almost five-hundred-page masterwork, Crowds
and Power (1960; trans. Carol Stewart, 1962). Last year, Fitscarraldo
Editions published Canetti’s The Book Against Death (trans. Peter
Filkins), a collection of short prose pieces, including aphorisms, addressing mortality.
It’s a writer’s notebook, not an organized thesis. Canetti tends to favor the cryptic over the strictly moralistic. A few samples:
“The Earth as the Titanic.
The last musician.”
“All of the dying are
martyrs of a future world religion.”
“Death and love are always
set side by side, but they only share one thing: parting.”
“What is more awful than
to just go with one’s times? What is deadlier?”
In an earlier book, The
Human Province (1972; trans. Joachim Neugroschel, 1978), Canetti makes an
observation that will prompt admirers of aphoristic writing to nod their heads:
“The great writers of aphorisms read as if they had all known each other well.”
No comments:
Post a Comment