“The man who is both happy and an optimist is an imbecile.”
Happiness has always felt
like the byproduct of life properly lived, not a goal unto itself. If I “behave”
– live up to my own standards, not exaggerate my importance, pay minute
attention to my conscience, respect others when they deserve it and
occasionally when they don’t – I can settle for “happiness.” I define it not as
bliss but as ease, a sort of momentary relaxation of vigilance. It doesn’t have
a lot to do with getting my way and I can’t usually blame others when “unhappiness”
creeps in.
The late Terry Teachout
rather charmingly characterized himself (and H.L. Mencken, about whom he wrote
a biography) as an “ebullient pessimist,” and I promptly adopted the description
as my own, though I’m certainly less ebullient than Terry. In defiance of the customary
understanding of “pessimist,” there was nothing gloomy or grim about him. He
was a regular guy, fabulously learned, hard-working, seemingly undefeated by
life’s inevitable troubles. His company was always energizing, even via the
internet. My wife and I had lunch with him here in Houston in 2018, when he
signed my copy of Pops, his biography of Louis Armstrong, “in honor of a
special day.”
I’m skeptical of people
who casually declare themselves “optimists.” I’m reminded of the character of
Imlac in Dr. Johnson’s Rasselas:
“The state of a mind
oppressed with a sudden calamity . . . is like that of the fabulous inhabitants
of the new-created earth, who, when the first night came upon them, supposed
that day would never return. When the clouds of sorrow gather over us, we see
nothing beyond them, nor can imagine how they will be dispelled: yet a new day
succeeded the night, and sorrow is never long without a dawn of ease. But they
who restrain themselves from receiving comfort do as the savages would have
done, had they put out their eyes when it was dark."
There is, in other words, something profoundly self-centered about optimism, a sense that if I don’t get my way I’ve been cheated. How unfair the world is. The sentence at the top was written by Jules Renard in his Journal on July 30, 1903. I think of Renard not as a doomsayer but a pragmatic, rough-and-tumble realist, with the sensibility of a farmer.
[The Renard passage is
taken from Journal 1887-1910 (trans. Theo Cuffe, selected and introduced
by Julian Barnes, riverrun, 2020).]
No comments:
Post a Comment