“Metaphors will, I know, ultimately be my ruin, but in the meantime I hope I make myself reasonably plain.”
I think of metaphors less as literary devices than a mode of thought. To describe something to
another person, especially something novel or inexplicable, we liken it to
something familiar. My mind has always worked by association. One thing reminds
me automatically of another, so metaphors tend to appear without effort. There’s
a mystery here. I’ve learned to trust, in most cases, the instantaneous appearance
of a metaphor.
In Thursday’s post I likened
encountering an interesting bit of trivia to “finding a gold coin on an empty
beach.” The sense is plain but a reader objects to the metaphor as being “too
cute,” “a stretch.” Perhaps. I intended it to be vivid and slightly absurd,
which brings up another aspect of metaphor-making: the potential for humor.
Metaphors can be amusing while doing the more sober job of making something
clear to a reader. So many of the metaphors we hear in conversation and see in
print – “black as night,” “sharp as a tack” – are tediously lazy clichés. Accuracy
with a hint of comedy or irony is a pleasing combination.
“The author of ‘Hours in a
Library’ belongs, it is hardly necessary to say, to the class of writers who
use their steam for the purpose of going straight ahead. He is always greatly
concerned with his subject. If he is out fox-hunting, he comes home with the
brush, and not with a spray of blackberries; but if, on the other hand, he goes
out blackberrying, he will return deeply dyed the true tint, and not dragging
behind him a languishing coil of seaweed.”
1 comment:
"We don’t think of politicians as even being literate today", but it was only recently that literary journalist Boris Johnson was PM of Great Britain. I don't know anything about his politics (my sister who follows the UK papers hates him). But he was tremendous admirer of Samuel Johnson, so much so, that if you name a dog Boris, I should love the dog.
Post a Comment