Pessimism has its charms, chief among them being the reduced likelihood of disappointment. Even on the diminished scale of an individual life, utopia is toddler-level delusion. I still remember the cover of the April 1970 issue of Ramparts magazine, which proclaimed “Utopia Now!” I was seventeen, a senior in high school, and already knew this was dangerous nonsense. Here is a poem by the late American poet Kelly Cherry, “History” (Hazard and Prospect: New and Selected Poems, 2007):
“It is what, to tell the
truth, you sometimes feel
That you have had enough
of, though of course
You do not really mean
that, since you recall
It well enough to know
things could be worse
And probably are going to
get that way
But still want a long and
memorable life, which means
Having to learn more of it
day by day,
The names and dates of all
the kings and queens
And those less famous who
ruled the territory
Known as your heart and
now are gone, by one
Dark route or another,
from the plot of your story.
But you write on, and are
your own best Gibbon,
And read on, this
monumental subject being
The decline and fall of
almost everything.”
Personal history and the
bigger history are natural analogues. Reviewing our lives, we fashion periods, epochs,
designated by the people in our life, jobs, illness or health, geography,
happiness or misery. We flatter ourselves, understandably, fancying we are
little Gibbons, assuming no one else knows us better than ourselves.
I remember learning some years ago that among Gibbon’s admirers was Iggy Pop, nĂ© James Newell Osterberg, Jr., leader of the proto-punk band The Stooges. In 1995, Pop published in Classics Ireland a brief essay titled “Caesar Lives,” in which he recounts his reading of The History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, first in an abridged edition and later the full six volumes. Pop lists five benefits from reading Gibbon, the most admirable being, “I find out how little I know.”
In Seven Books That
Everyone Once Read and No One Now Does (Ludovika University Press, 2025),
Nicholas Tate acknowledges Pop’s essay and writes:
“It was not just the
admiration that one hard-working artist had for a ‘guy’ who had ‘stuck with
things’ or that the cameo illustration of Gibbon on the cover made him look
like ‘a heavy dude’, but also the beauty of the language, the sense of being
freed from the tyranny of the present, and the humbling revelation of ‘how
little I know’. If Gibbon got it all wrong and is looking down from some other
place, one can imagine the broad smile on the heavy dude’s chubby face – Gibbon
was no prude – at the thought that two hundred years later his magnum opus was
being read with great pleasure, to the accompaniment of drugs and whisky,
around 4 a.m. in cheap motels somewhere in the American South.”
No comments:
Post a Comment