“[T]here is, perhaps, a special pleasure in re-learning the names of many of the flowers every spring. It is like re-reading a book that one has almost forgotten. Montaigne tells us that he had so bad a memory that he could always read an old book as though he had never read it before.”
The Irish critic Robert Lynd (1879-1949) is writing in the title essay of his 1921 collection The Pleasures of Ignorance. Naturally, I couldn’t remember which essay by Montaigne he cited but logically enough I found the passage in “Of Books”:
“To compensate a little for the treachery and
weakness of my memory, so extreme that it has happened to me more than once to
pick up again, as recent and unknown to me, books which I had read carefully a
few years before and scribbled over with my notes, I have adopted the habit for
some time now of adding at the end of each book (I mean of those that I intend
to use only once) the time I finished reading it and the judgment I have
derived of it as a whole . . .”
I had a similar experience recently when looking up something I had written on Anecdotal Evidence eighteen years ago. I quickly found it but in the same post I referred to another book I have no recollection of having read. The title and even the author’s name are blanks in memory. Lynd would understand:
“I have myself a capricious and leaking memory. I can read Hamlet itself and The Pickwick Papers as though they were the work of new authors and had come wet from the press, so much of them fades between one reading and another.”
“With a bad memory,” Lynd
writes, “one can go on reading Plutarch and The Arabian Nights all one's
life. Little shreds and tags, it is probable, will stick even in the worst
memory, just as a succession of sheep cannot leap through a gap in a hedge
without leaving a few wisps of wool on the thorns. But the sheep themselves
escape, and the great authors leap in the same way out of an idle memory and
leave little enough behind.”
In On the Ivory Stages
(Mirabeau Press, 2024), Theodore Dalrymple calls Lynd “a distinguished
essayist” and says his work is “very un-strident in tone” for a man
so heavily involved in Irish politics. Rather, his essays are “those of an
amused, sceptical observer of the follies of mankind, as well as a recorder of
the small pleasures of existence.”
[The Montaigne passage is from the translation of The Complete Essays of Montaigne by Donald Frame (Stanford University Press, 1957).]
2 comments:
A thought experiment: one has been imprisoned with others and we are permitted to talk, tell stories, etc. Now, since I have spent so many of my waking hours reading fiction since I was in ninth grade, I should (one might think) be able to regale everyone with hundreds of hours of retold stories. But what are the books I could retell reasonably well, in my own words and allowing, no doubt, for some elements of my own imagination? Could I retell Great Expectations, for example, which I have read four times? It might be interesting to compile a list of the books that I think I would be able to retell; also, short stories, folk tales, etc. I've been trying on a very modest scale to memorize some short poems, recently Robert Graves's "Love Without Hope," & now am learning Walter Scott's "Proud Maisie." I hope I could retell a good many stories. Certainly I don't have many personal anecdotes for an audience such as the proposed one.
"I may be a man of wide reading, but I am also a man of no retention." --Montaigne
In Joseph Epstein's 2024 "Familiarity Breeds Content: New and Selected Essays"
Post a Comment