For the first time, my youngest son, working as a Peace Corps volunteer in Peru, recommended a book for me to read. It was a novel written by an American and published about a decade ago. I read little contemporary fiction but the book’s setting interested me and I felt that I owed my son an honest effort.
I petered out after
seventy pages. I felt guilty about it but the novel was long and my tolerance
was short. It’s not a bad book. In fact the novelist is gifted. He writes well
and obviously has done his homework. But I stopped caring about his people and
their fate. The failure, I suspect, is mine, which is why I’m not identifying
the novel or its author. I apologized to my son and asked him not to stop
recommending the books he liked.
I turned nostalgic and
remembered how, when young, I was a fiction-reading machine. When I discovered
a writer I liked, I tended to exhaust his back catalogue. Melville comes to
mind, and Nabokov. From that experience I learned that certain novels stuck
with me and some were forgotten. This is not a universal critical statement but a personal expression
of what is lastingly important to one reader. I might mention Death Comes for the Archbishop, Nostromo, Zeno’s
Conscience, Daniel Deronda, The Golden Bowl, Lolita, Parade’s
End, The Assistant, Time Will Darken It, War and Peace, The Leopard, Mr.
Sammler’s Planet, Proust’s masterwork, among many others – all novels
I have read at least twice and often many times.
In his essay “Quixotism” (The
Hall of Uselessness: Collected Essays, 2013), Simon Leys recalls a philosopher
he knew when young. Leys asked him to assemble “a list of basic readings.” Leys
says he treasured this document and then lost it after many years. He has forgotten most
of the books on the list but adds:
“What I still remember is
the postscript the great philosopher had inscribed at the bottom of the page—I remember
it vividly because, at the time, I did not understand it and it puzzled me. The
postscript said (underlined), ‘Most important of all, don’t forget: do read a
lot of novels.”
Leys says that as an “immature
student,” this shocked him. “Somehow it did not sound serious enough,” he
writes. “For, naively, we tend to confuse what is serious with what is deep.”
He continues: “It took me a long time to appreciate the full wisdom of my
philosopher’s advice. Now I frequently encounter echoes of it.”
Among those echoes for me
is something Joseph Epstein writes in The Novel, Who Needs It? (Encounter Books, 2023):
“The knowledge provided by the best novels is knowledge that cannot be enumerated nor subjected to strict testing. Wider, less confined, deeper, its subject is human existence itself, in all its dense variousness and often humbling confusion.”
No comments:
Post a Comment