I often think about the continuity of personality. Not in the abstract sense, as an academic exercise in human psychology. Rather, as an aspect of your life and mine. Are we the same people we were at age twelve or twenty? Is that a metaphysical question? Is it trivial?
At the trivial level of DNA, of course. Our genetic inheritance is always with us. But why is it, when I look back at my younger self, I am puzzled and sometimes ashamed? Why the hell did I do that? What did I hope to accomplish? How could I be so thoughtless? At the time, I would have congratulated myself on making enlightened decisions. I read Freud and Proust. I knew something about people and their behavior. That twenty-year-old kid seems foreign to me, and yet I recognize him. I hurt people and congratulated myself on my precious moral principles.
In 1914, the year he turned seventy-four, Thomas Hardy published Satires of Circumstance, Lyrics and Reveries, with Miscellaneous Pieces. Among the poems collected in the volume is “Seventy-Four and Twenty”:
“Here goes a man of
seventy-four,
Who sees not what life
means for him,
And here another in years
a score
Who reads its very figure
and trim.
“The one who shall walk
to-day with me
Is not the youth who gazes
far,
But the breezy wight who
cannot see
What Earth's ingrained
conditions are.”
I turn seventy-four today
and feel like an unlikely mashup of Hardy’s two subjects. I’m often as blind
and oblivious as the old man and occasionally able to “read” life’s “very
figure and trim.” I can soothe myself with words like this – “That’s just
human” – which smells rankly like bullshit. In another poem from the volume, “Regret Me Not,” Hardy writes:
“I did not know
That heydays fade and go,
But deemed that what was would be always so.”
No comments:
Post a Comment