“I
find I can become interested in almost anything -- Liebling on boxing comes to
mind -- if it’s the subject of a well-written book or essay. Not to suggest
that Japan wouldn’t otherwise be interesting, but presentation is always
important. I hope you find it enjoyable.”
I
do, and I enthusiastically agree with my friend’s judgment of what makes a book
readable. Some subjects are irresistible. I would read almost anything written about,
say, Louis Armstrong, ferns, etymology and Samuel Johnson. On the other hand,
almost the only subjects I can’t imagine reading about, regardless of how well
written the article or book, are economics, finance, monetary policy and
banking – brittle, lifeless, soul-sucking matters. I read a lot of Marx when
young, disproving my point, but I still haven’t read Adam Smith, John Maynard
Keynes or Friedrich Hayek.
The
Liebling volume is a perfect example of great writing about an unpromising
subject. Likewise, I have no interest in gambling but occasionally reread A.
Alvarez’s wonderful The Biggest Game in
Town (1983). I knew little about César Franck and his music but I’m enjoying César Franck: His Life and Times (2012)
by R.J. Stove. Uruguay is a vast emptiness in my knowledge of the world, but I
wish more novels by Juan Carlos Onetti would be translated into English (find La vida breve, 1950; trans. as A Brief Life, 1976).
Which
brings to mind Herman Melville, born on this date, Aug. 1, in 1819. What
subject could be less attractive than whaling, a savage business? In Chapter
CIV of Moby-Dick (1851), “The
Fossil-Whale,” Melville writes:
“Such,
and so magnifying, is the virtue of a large and liberal theme! We expand to its
bulk. To produce a mighty book, you must choose a mighty theme. No great and
enduring volume can ever be written on the flea, though many there be who have
tried it.”
Ishmael
was born too soon to read Brendan Lehane’s The
Compleat Flea (1969).
No comments:
Post a Comment