So
says Theodore Dalrymple in “Notes of a Bibliomaniac,” an essay that begins like
a memoir of bookishness and wends quietly into a meditation on historical humility,
concluding appropriately with the sentence quoted above. Dalrymple’s gift for
turning the commonplace (a fondness for old books) into common-sense moral
reflection (“history should not be read as the backward projection of our
current discontents, or of our grievances”) remains the source of his abiding
charm and persuasiveness.
Dalrymple
finds an 1857 volume published by Dr. Peter Hood, The Successful Treatment of Scarlet Fever. About the
once-devastating disease, Dalrymple says, Hood “discovered nothing new.” His
research was a medical cul-de-sac, one of many. With the introduction of
antibiotics in the twentieth century, the disease became, according to
Dalrymple, “rare.” But not eradicated. Scarlet fever saved Primo Levi’s life.
In
January 1945, with Soviet troops approaching, the Nazis evacuated the healthy
prisoners – that is, ambulatory -- held in Auschwitz. Most of them died during
the subsequent march or later in Buchenwald or Mauthausen. Sick with scarlet
fever in the camp infirmary, Levi was left behind. Soviet troops arrived ten
days later, on January 27. Levi describes that gap between Nazi evacuation and
Soviet arrival in the final chapter of his first book, If This Is a Man (1947, also titled Survival in Auschwitz):
“All
the healthy prisoners (except a few prudent ones who at the last moment
undressed and hid themselves in the hospital beds) left during the night of 18
January 1945. They must have been about twenty thousand, coming from different
camps. Almost in their entirety they vanished during the evacuation march. Alberto
[Dalla Volta, Levi’s friend] was among them. Perhaps someone will write their
story one day.”
No comments:
Post a Comment