In the
preface, which Sterne in effect makes the seventh chapter, I’ve placed a
vertical line down the right margin of the first paragraph and written “Locke.”
I’ve underlined the final phrases – “…we lie under so many impediments to
communicating our sensations out of our own sphere, as often amount to a total
impossibility.” Beside this I write “Beckett” – evidence of another recently
acquired literary enthusiasm. Such marks are meaningless now, but at the time I
think they amounted to laying claim to turf, staking out foreign territory,
planting a flag and making it mine. Several pages later in the chapter titled “The
Remise Door,” I underline, in a spirit of Sternean self-referentiality, “with a
look which I thought a sufficient commentary
upon the text.” I had also recently read Pale
Fire for the first time. In another chapter, titled “The Remise,” I
underline “to make love the first moment, and an offer of his person the
second,” and write “—in the coach, like Emma Bovary.” I was an insufferably bookish
young man. Later notes refer to Cervantes, Borges, Smollett, David Hume, Gogol
and Shakespeare. With an asterisk and underlining I mark what remains my
favorite line in Sterne’s novel: “I think there is a fatality in it—I seldom go
to the place I set out for.”
In Marginalia: Readers Writing in Books
(Yale University Press, 2001), H.J. Jackson writes: “We would do well to
consider the example of the sociable readers of the eighteenth century and
later who shared their annotated books and looked on readers’ notes as value
added.” Rereading my old markings, I think of Charles Lamb’s essay, “The TwoRaces of Men,” in which he comically complains of the marks left in his books
when he loans them to his childhood friend Coleridge, a chronic marginalia-ist.
On this date, Dec. 9, in 1796, Charles Lamb writes to Coleridge, as I might
write to my younger book-marking self:
“There is
a pensive state of recollection, in which the mind is disposed to apostrophise
the departed objects of its attachment, and, breaking loose from grammatical
precision, changes from the 1st to the 3rd, and from the 3rd to the 1st person,
just as the random fancy or the feeling directs.”
1 comment:
A biographer--probably Joseph Ellis--of John Adams has a knowing account of Adams' library. He says Adams, always argumentative, would write long and detailed dissents in the margins of his books. And would keep them. Which is to say, if you judged his tastes by his library, you would have gotten entirely the wrong impression, because he seemed to treasure most the books he agreed with least.
Post a Comment