He is the most congenial
of writers. The Frenchman is us, if only we were smarter, friendlier, more
stoical, learned and articulate. His cognate in the Anglophone world is Dr. Johnson.
Like the Englishman, he never pretends to be more than himself. The mature
Montaigne is without pretensions, or at least his pretensions are roughly the
size of our own. Danny Heitman, author of the quoted passage at the top, celebrates
the inventor (and namer) of the least likely literary form, the essay. As
Heitman writes: “Someone writing randomly about what he’s thinking for
hundreds of pages sounds pretty dull, but Montaigne pulls it off.”
I was amused by Heitman’s diplomatic reference to our own
Ralph Waldo Emerson as “an often earnest New Englander with a Brahmin’s sense
of propriety.” In “Reading Montaigne,” Joseph Epstein, of course, credits the Frenchman with the invention
of the essay. In “The Personal Essay: A Form of Discovery” (A Literary Education and Other Essays, 2014), Epstein goes on to describe
the personal essay as “a happy accident of literature” and Montaigne as its “first
great practitioner.” Then he shifts his attention to Emerson, and things get
amusing:
“My own
introduction to the personal essay—one, I suspect, shared by many in my generation—was
by way of the bloated, vatic, never less than pompous Ralph Waldo Emerson and
the sometimes rather precious Charles Lamb. Few things are more efficient at
killing the taste for a certain kind of literature than being force-fed it in
school at an early age. Although I have come to have a higher opinion of Lamb
and an even lower one of Emerson, having to read them at an early age all but
effectively killed the essay for me.”
Amen. I
still, on rare occasions, enjoy Emerson as a phrase-maker. His essays, which
are largely incoherent as wholes, glitter with shiny bits. Emerson understands
almost nothing of the world. He is a moral simpleton. But he insisted on
thinking, and that always got him in trouble.
No comments:
Post a Comment