“Writing
is a cheerful activity. You can cheerfully write that you’re going to kill
yourself.”
Cheerfulness
implies satisfaction, equanimity, the absence of self-pity, and a sense of
accomplishment even if the job remains undone. It is not an emotional utopia.
One can be cheerful in the midst of trouble, gloom and suffering. Recall
Boswell’s account of Johnson meeting his former schoolmate Oliver Edwards, who
says: “You are a philosopher, Dr. Johnson. I have tried too in my time to be a
philosopher; but, I don't know how, cheerfulness was always breaking in.”
Writing is cheerful because one volunteers to cavort with words. Think of
Hazlitt’s favorite word: gusto. An
adroitly phrased sentence freighted with bad news can soothe the soul. In “Reasons to Be Cheerful,” Theodore Dalrymple puts it neatly:
“Thanks
to the fact that I write, my life is satisfactory: I can inhabit gloom and live
in joy. When something unpleasant happens to me, provided only that is
potentially of literary use, my first thought is ‘How best can I describe
this?’ I thereby distance myself from my own displeasure or irritation.”
The
passage at the top is by the French writer Georges Perros (1923-1978) in Paper Collage: Selected Aphorisms and Short
Prose (Seagull Books, 2015). He resumes his thought:
“Writing
can only aim for an ellipse, a poem or the illusion of efficiency. Language is
an ocean of words. As for me, either I drown in it or, when the tide goes out,
I look around, walking on what’s left behind. Holes, puddles. Fragmentary
writing means these puddles, these marine remnants, these shells, these wet
pieces of evidence. My attentiveness dries them off.”
Perros
might be describing the care and feeding of a blog. Such independence for the
writer is new to the world. That we choose too often not to celebrate but to
whine is our problem, one we too often impose on the world. Perros’ maritime
metaphor is perfect: To net an appropriate cliché, the world is his oyster. Writers
are doubly blessed, trolling for “wet pieces of evidence” and fitting them to
the proper words. Think of the dark-minded writers -- Ambrose Bierce, H.L.
Mencken, Thomas Bernhard, among others -- who worked cheerfully. In his final letter
to his sister, written as he was about to die from cancer, Guy Davenport said,
“”I hope you’re as happy as I am.”
[I
heard about Paper Collage from this review by Ron Slate.]
1 comment:
"I thereby distance myself from my own displeasure or irritation.”
Isn't this the definition of being human as opposed to being an animal?
And isn't, therefore, writing a metaphor for the human condition in that it is a vehicle for our detachment from what happens to us? An immensely human privilege unavailable to other suffering creatures.
Post a Comment