“An
attachment to writers of a previous generation needn’t be a nostalgia but a
back-to-the-future, a wished for alternative to the too often facetious present
and a hope for things to come . . .”
A
reader objects to mention of Max Beerbohm. “Too boring, too precious,” and so
on. His indictment fits not Beerbohm, the most amusing of writers, but -- well,
likely nominees are plentiful and welcome. Beerbohm was the most major of minor
writers, a miniaturist of delicacy and inveterate irony, sometimes savage. He
writes to his first biographer: “My gifts are small. I've used them very well
and discreetly, never straining them; and the result is that I've made a
charming little reputation. But that reputation is a frail plant.” Can you
think of a contemporary writer confident enough to say such a thing?
In
the profoundly optimistic passage quoted at the top, the Irish poet Derek Mahon
is referring most immediately to Cyril Connolly in his essay “Montaigne
Redivivus” (Red Sails, 2104), but any
writer from the past who has earned our gratitude will do. No place is more
provincial than the present, and one of the reasons we read the best writers,
apart from pure pleasure, is to get a little distance on the world we already inhabit
and presume to know. Look at the soft-headed vandals at Penn who this week removed
Shakespeare’s portrait and replaced it with a hack’s. Mahon says: “Quite soon
we’ll see the crime of elitism on the statute books, another nail in the coffin
of civilization.”
Joseph
Epstein, a Beerbohm admirer, recently read Theodor Mommsen’s The History of Rome and said it “made
the most profound impression upon me, and simultaneously provided the greatest
pleasure.” I know the feeling – not with Mommsen, whose work I’ve never read,
but with a hundred other books that moved me. That’s how I felt after reading
Landor’s Imaginary Conversations, Swift’s
Drapier’s Letters and Tacitus (1958) by Ronald Syme, after it
was suggested to me by Epstein, who writes in his Mommsen piece:
“Literature
is a house of many mansions, and such historians have provided one of the most
stately among them. The village idiot of the shtetl of Frampol was given the
job of waiting at the village gates for the arrival of the Messiah. The pay
wasn’t great, he was told, but the work was steady. So it is, as serious
readers will have noticed, with the reading life. The pay may not be great, but
one is never out of work.”
1 comment:
I was a modest, good-humoured boy. It is Oxford that has made
me insufferable.
-- Max Beerbohm, _More_
He has the most remarkable and seductive genius--and I should
say about the smallest in the world.
-- Lytton Strachey, letter to Clive Bell, 4 December 1917
The Gods bestowed on Max the gift of perpetual old age.
-- Oscar Wilde, in _Vincent O'Sullivan's _Aspects of Wilde_,
1936
If one compares two drawings or two books of his, it is almost
impossible, on the evidence of the works themselves, to date them.
Despite this lack of development, his work doesn't 'date', as one
would expect, and as the work of so many of his contemporaries does.
If one asks why this should be so, the answer is, I believe, that in
him the aesthetic sensibility was never divorced, as it was in many of
his colleagues, from the moral feelings. Fashions in what is
considered beautiful or interesting are always changing, but the
difference between a man of honour and a scoundrel is eternal.
-- W. H. Auden, _Forewords and Afterwords_, 1973
Post a Comment