It’s no
surprise that the list of books I first read as a boy and have continued to
read periodically ever sense, despite fortunate changes in taste and
understanding, is brief and respectable. Nothing to be ashamed of. No Zane Gray
(whom I’ve never read) or Jules Verne (whom I haven’t read since I started
shaving). There’s the Bible, Kim and Robinson Crusoe, all of which give me
even more pleasure now than when I first read them as a kid. But when a reader
wrote this week asking which “classic” (his word, not mine) I would recommend
for his twelve-year-old daughter (“She’s already a strong reader”), the answer
was simple: Gulliver’s Travels. The
book can be read without strain as pure adventure and/or savage satire. The “and/or”
is the secret to Swift’s genius. I can’t remember my initial reaction to the Houyhnhnms.
Today, their portion of the book, Part IV, is my favorite. Gulliver, at last,
knows a measure of happiness. What the Houyhnhnms lack is precisely what
England has in excess, as spelled out in Chap X:
“I enjoyed
perfect Health of Body and Tranquillity of Mind; I did not find the Treachery
or Inconstancy of a Friend, nor the Injuries of a secret or open Enemy. I had
no occasion of bribing, flattering or pimping, to procure the Favour of any
great Man or of his Minion. I wanted no Fence against Fraud or Oppression; Here
was neither Physician to destroy my Body, nor Lawyer to ruin my Fortune; No
Informer to watch my Words, and Actions, or forge Accusations against me for
Hire: Here were no Gibers, Censurers, Backbiters, Pick-pockets, Highwaymen,
Housebreakers, Attorneys, Bawds, Buffoons, Gamesters, Politicians, Wits,
splenetick tedious Talkers, Controvertists, Ravishers, Murderers, Robbers,
Virtuoso's, no Leaders or Followers of Party and Faction; no Encouragers to
Vice, by Seducement or Examples: No Dungeon, Axes, Gibbets, Whipping-posts, or
Pillories: No cheating Shop-keepers or Mechanicks: No Pride, Vanity or
Affectation: No Fops, Bullies, Drunkards, strolling Whores, or Poxes: No
ranting, lewd, expensive Wives: No stupid, proud Pedants: No importunate,
overbearing, quarrelsome, noisy, roaring, empty, conceited, swearing
Companions: No Scoundrels, raised from the Dust for the sake of their Vices, or
Nobility thrown into it on account of their Virtues: No Lords, Fidlers, Judges
or Dancing-Masters.”
No Dancing-Masters, praise be. Swift delivers a lesson in stone-cold irony, a catalog of
accelerating hilarity and some of the cleanest prose in the language. Precisely
what a twelve-year-old needs.
1 comment:
Although I find it difficult to remember what I was reading at 12, I would not have picked this passage from "Gulliver's Travels": do I detect your irony here? Rather tentatively, I think I read V. Hugo's "Les Miserables" at this age (without understanding a great deal of it) and would suggest this classic tale. It offers drama, romance, adventure, history both social and political, and is set in a foreign country. Above all, it is a tale of moral choices, honour and loyalty, and I think this appeals to 12 year olds. But this is just one I recall amongst the Arthur Ransomes etc.
Post a Comment