“I do not write for the reader, for people, for
society. I write for myself, for my own self-regarding pleasure, trying to
excel and always failing of the excellence I desire. If no one ever read me,
would I write? Perhaps not; but I would not be able to stop writing in my head.”
Pritchett speaks for every honest writer.
High-mindedness doesn’t suit us. Watch your back (and your wallet) when a
writer proclaims his dedication to the cause
du jour. We pride ourselves on independence of thought, but most of us are
as free-thinking as a nest of fire ants. Writers ought to be no more engagé than pipefitters, who probably know
more about politics anyway. Pritchett begins his preface like this:
“If we are asked what, from the social point of
view, writers are for, one answer seems to be that they exist to show the
inconvenience of human nature; just as from the private point of view, they
enlarge human nature's knowledge of itself. But do we ask more of writers in a
time like the present? Ought they not, perhaps, be putting their shoulders to
some wheel or other? And which one? After all (the cliché runs) ‘this is a time
of crisis, this is an age of revolution, transition, despair.’ . . . The cliché
is not necessarily untrue because it is conventional; it is simply not helpful.”
No comments:
Post a Comment