“The
resistance we feel against allowing the extent of the unknown into our view of
reality gives us a powerful drive to piece together a complete picture out of what
we do know, or can know. But alas, the human situation is as if we were given
some but not all of the pieces of a jigsaw puzzle and left to make a complete
picture of them.”
As a teenager
as was I briefly enthralled by Karl Shapiro’s 1960 essay collection In Defense of Ignorance, in part because
of the provocative title. While I still respect much of Shapiro’s early poetry,
I outgrew his enthusiasms, exemplars of ignorance – Blake, Whitman, Lawrence,
Henry Miller. That is, the Romantics and their heirs. In other words, yet
another “complete picture,” and a rather confused one. Near the conclusion of
his brief volume Magee writes:
“It is
easier to accept the security of a faith, either in the existence of unknowable
entities or in their non-existence, than it is to confront the full range and
scale of our ignorance and live with that. This last is what more than anything
I would like to do – that, and perhaps to push back the frontiers of ignorance,
as the philosophers I have named [Locke, Hume, Kant, Shopenhauer] did in such
fruitful ways.”
I’m not
certain about all of this. I find faith remarkably challenging, a perpetual tug-of-war
between certainty and doubt, knowledge and ignorance. What I find attractive
and useful in Magee’s thinking is his championing of our ignorance and its uses.
It should never leave us passive. With each question, with each tentative,
tested answer, we gain a sliver of knowledge. Ignorance is best confronted with
a mingling of humility and defiance. Magee is a self-defined agnostic, in a
sense that is neither resigned nor defeatist:
“What I find
myself wanting to press home more than anything else is that the only honest
way to live and think is the fullest possible acknowledgement of our ignorance
and its consequences, without ducking out into a faith, whether positive or
negative, and without any other evasions or self-indulgences.”
A thoughtful
faith isn’t a matter of “ducking out.” It’s not an evasion or a deception but a
useful way to address our profound and very human ignorance.
1 comment:
All due respect, but the idea of "outgrowing" so colossal a figure as Blake brings a smile to my face.
Post a Comment