I can’t recall
ever using tumult in writing or
conversation, and one seldom encounters it. Tumultuous,
yes, but usually as a cliché in journalism, a lazy way to describe an era (“those
tumultuous Sixties”). It’s a good word to avoid. Tumult echoes in my inner ear with tummler and tumble, which
help ameliorate any residual pretentiousness. It sounds like a broken-backed,
stitched-together word, a fading trochee. It has its uses. One thinks of the Boar’s Head scene in Henry IV, Part II, in which Mistress
Quickly observes: “Here’s a goodly tumult!”
Back to “quiet
tumult”: James is playing with a near-oxymoron, but the unexpected pairing makes
sense. We think of tumults as noisy affairs, like mob scenes or mosh pits. But disturb
an ants’ nest with the tip of your cane and what do you have? Or watch the play
of sunlight on the ground as filtered through the leaves of a breeze-tossed
tree. A passage of prose or verse might also be a quiet tumult. Consider our
foremost painter in prose, Vladimir Nabobov, in Speak, Memory:
“I recall
one particular sunset. It lent an ember to my bicycle bell. Overhead, above the
black music of telegraph wires, a number of long, dark-violet clouds lined with
flamingo pink hung motionless in a fan-shaped arrangement; the whole thing was
like some prodigious ovation in terms of color and form! It was dying, however,
and everything else was darkening, too; but just above the horizon, in a lucid,
turquoise space, beneath a black stratus, the eye found a vista that only a
fool could mistake for the spare parts of this or any other sunset. It occupied
a very small sector of the enormous sky and had the peculiar neatness of
something seen through the wrong end of a telescope. There it lay in wait, a family
of serene clouds in miniature, an accumulation of brilliant convolutions,
anachronistic in their creaminess and extremely remote; remote but perfect in
every detail; fantastically reduced but faultlessly shaped; my marvelous
tomorrow ready to be delivered to me.”
No comments:
Post a Comment