Saturday, June 22, 2019

'The Perfection of a Starched Shirt-Front'

“His work has the perfection of a starched shirt-front, which if it is not perfect is nothing.”

Not many readers expect or even want perfection in literature. Some would deny it exists, even theoretically, and others wouldn’t recognize it if it bit them on the leg. Often, there’s a reverse snobbery at play, a rejection of such qualities of perfection as elegance, wit and musicality. This helps explain the enduring popularity of Charles Bukowski and Joyce Carol Oates. Perfection is somehow uppity, even judgmental of its readers. For others there’s something forbiddingly cold and inhuman about perfection. Men and women are irredeemably flawed, goes the reasoning; so are their creations. They haven’t read Max Beerbohm.

The Anglo-Irish essayist Robert Lynd (1879-1949), author of the sentence quoted at the top, is writing in 1922, two years after Beerbohm published his finest essay collection, And Even Now, which is perfect (as is Lynd’s sentence), though "starch" and "shirt-front" might need explanations for younger readers. Lynd continues:

“‘Max’ takes what may be called an evening-dress view of life. One would not be surprised to learn that he writes in evening dress. He has that air of good conversation without intimacy, of deliberate charm, of cool and friendly brilliance that always shows at its best above a shining and expressionless shirt-front.”

Lynd tells us Beerbohm is in danger of being canonized: “In order to avoid this unseemly canonization—or, at least, to keep it within the bounds of reason—one would like to adopt the ungracious part of advocatus diaboli and state the case against ‘Max’ in the strongest possible terms. But, alas! One finds that there is nothing to say against him, except that he is not Shakespeare or Dr. Johnson.”

Other perfect works? Anthony Hecht’s “Green: An Epistle.” Nabokov’s “A Guide to Berlin.” Yvor Winters’ “Time and the Garden.” Gulliver’s Travels (a rare long-form specimen of perfection, as are Evelyn Waugh’s Scoop and Willa Cather’s Death Comes for the Archbishop). La Rochefoucauld’s Maxims. J.V. Cunningham’s “For My Contemporaries.” Feel free to add a work or two. It will never be a long list.

[Lynd’s essay on Beerbohm is collected in Essays on Life and Literature, published by Everyman’s Library in 1951.]

2 comments:

Faze said...

Pleasantly surprised to see "Guide to Berlin" here. It's always seemed to me to share some of its author's most essential insights.

Baceseras said...

What is perfection in a literary work? In epigrammatic forms -- Cunningham's or la Rochefoucauld's -- a perfection might be achieved that would be impossible for Swift's Gulliver or the Cather novel. These must include "wrong notes that sound right," to accomplish their full effect. Or are these wrong notes then themselves perfections?

I presume Lynd is blaming The Impeccable Max for "mere" perfection, which is to say, for superficiality. He's not exactly wrong. But if such perfection is a flaw, the work isn't perfect after all, and Max is cleared of the charge. Oh dear, these paradoxes.