American journalism
has given us several of our finest writers; preeminently, A.J. Liebling and
H.L. Mencken. Presumably, both men, at some point early in their careers, had
to cover their equivalent of the Ditch Maintenance Board. On this date, Feb.
28, in 1901, the Baltimore Morning Herald
published Mencken’s account of the city’s most recent Water Board meeting (waterboarding now has other
connotations). Mencken was twenty years old and had worked for the Morning Herald, his first newspaper,
since the previous year. He would stay there until 1906, when he joined the Sun. The story proves he could perform
the mundane tasks expected of a reporter. His prose is clean, if not as witty
as his subsequent work, and he manages to spice up his lede while still playing
it fairly straight:
“Water
Engineer Alfred M. Quick, whose part in the criticism of the municipal subways recently
subjected him to a vigorous ‘roast’ at the hands of Subway Engineer Phelps, has
evidently become something of a ‘roaster’ himself.”
Mencken is
in his element – the human comedy. Bureaucrats amused him. He performs the
well-known reporter’s dodge of transcribing the board’s financial report at length.
Half the story is lifted wholesale. Column inches must be filled somehow.
Mencken enjoys it when one pack of civic functionaries denigrates another: “In
the annual report of the water board, submitted to the mayor yesterday, half of
the sentences are burning ‘knocks’ at the board’s predecessors in office. The
latter are charged with all sorts of lapses and blunders from extravagance to
loose bookkeeping.”
Mencken
treasured his apprentice years. In 1898 he had taken a writing class with Cosmopolitan
University, an early correspondence school. That was his only formal training
in journalism and his only enrollment in higher education. (An interesting book
could be written about the accomplished men and women, especially writers, who
never went to college or never earned a degree.) In 1927, Mencken published in the Baltimore Evening Sun a retrospective account of his early years as
a newspaper reporter. It begins:
“Looking
back over a dull life, mainly devoted to futilities, I can discern three gaudy
and gorgeous years. They were my first three years as a newspaper reporter in
Baltimore, and when they closed I was still short of twenty-two. I recall them
more and more brightly as I grow older, and take greater delight in the
recalling. Perhaps the imagination of a decaying man has begun to gild them.
But gilded or not, they remain superb, and it is inconceivable that I’ll ever
see their like again. It is the fate of man, I believe, to be wholly happy only
once in his life. Well, I had my turn while I was still fully alive, and could
enjoy every moment.”
Few writers
wrote so convincingly and amusingly as Mencken about the pleasures and
satisfactions of life.
1 comment:
“Looking back over a dull life, mainly devoted to futilities, I can discern three gaudy and gorgeous years."
That sentence brings to mind, and makes me want to reread, "Happy Days".
I read/listened-to that on Books-On-Tape cassettes when commuting between Columbus and Newark in the 1970s. Thanks!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Happy_Days,_1880%E2%80%931892
Post a Comment