“As [P.G.] Wodehouse grew ancient, he remained astonishingly clear of mind, firm of style, and chipper of heart; and it seems that at 93 he wrote with hardly less skill than he had commanded at 40.”
There are
times when I am convinced beyond rational argument that the supreme writer of
fiction in the twentieth century was P.G. Wodehouse. When some newly
enlightened grad student thinks he’s introducing me to William H. Gass, whom I
first read fifty-four years ago and sized up pretty quickly, I reach for Nothing But Wodehouse, a fat anthology
edited by Ogden Nash in 1935, and read in the first selection, “Jeeves Exerts
the Old Cerebellum” (1923): “A most amazing cove, Jeeves. So dashed competent in
every respect. I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again.” It’s like
homecoming. Language of Mozartian grace composed by a writer who respects his
readers and wishes to please them. There are other ways to write well but
seldom with such charm.
The passage
at the top was written by X.J. Kennedy in his 1978 review of Wodehouse’s
posthumously published final novel, Sunset
at Blandings. Kennedy shares with Wodehouse a wish to induce laugher in
readers commensurate with his ability to do so. Few spectacles are so bleak as
the guy who longs to be a comedian but is blessed with the wit of Al Gore. John
Simon once described Kennedy as “a curious cross between the boulevardier and
the Metaphysical: he believes in the well-made, witty but significant poem,
donning its top hat and its Donne.” Almost too clever, which is Simon’s style, but
there’s something to it. Kennedy is raunchier than Wodehouse, more pointedly satirical,
blacker-minded. Unlike Wodehouse, Kennedy can sting. Here is “At a Reading of
Poems of a Poet’s Agonies,” on that cruel and unusual ritual, the poetry
reading:
We sit and
listen, writhing in our chairs,
Pierced by a
pain far worse than what he shares.”
Kennedy
concludes his Wodehouse review with these words: “[I]t seems unlikely that any
other writer could pick up the pen Wodehouse let fall. Luckily, in his 65 years
as a novelist, he produced enough musicals without music -- or caricatures
without drawings -- to last the faithful almost forever.” As Kennedy notes in the
passage at the top, Wodehouse worked until the end, until he was ninety-three.
Kennedy will turn ninety-three on August 21. That’s an observance to remember,
not a prediction.
[Robert
Alter, reviewing The Tunnel for The New Republic in 1995, delivered the
definitive dish on Gass: “The bloat is a consequence of sheer adipose verbosity
and an unremitting condition of moral and intellectual flatulence.” Q.E.D.]
5 comments:
Thanks for this, Patrick. In my education and reading life I was never exposed or pointed to Wodehouse, but have always been aware of him. I now have a new world to explore.
John D., if you want advice for a first Wodehouse, may I recommend Laughing Gas, one of his funniest.
Thank you, Mike. I can see from your blog that you are a Wodehouse aficionado, so that is the one I will start with!
John Simon could be ponderous, but he wrote one of the funniest reviews I've ever read, his evisceration of The Exorcist.
Kennedy "on that cruel and unusual ritual, the poetry reading:
We sit and listen, writhing in our chairs,
Pierced by a pain far worse than what he shares.”
Brings to mind
“It was one of the dullest speeches I ever heard. The Agee woman told us for three quarters of an hour how she came to write her beastly book, when a simple apology was all that was required.” --Wodehouse, The Girl in Blue (1970)
Post a Comment