It’s an honor to be published in The New Criterion, a journal I started reading in 1986, four years after it was founded by the late Hilton Kramer and Samuel Lipman. To share pages in the June issue with Gary Saul Morson, Victor Davis Hanson and other gifted writers is humbling. A nice surprise in the new issue is a “Reconsiderations” feature by Mark Falcoff devoted to Evelyn Waugh’s 1939 volume Robbery Under Law: The Mexican Object-Lesson (1939). I first became aware of Falcoff almost twenty years ago when he published a “Reconsiderations” piece on the greatest of all Latin American novels, Joseph Conrad’s Nostromo: A Tale of the Seaboard (1904).
I’ve always
enjoyed reading Waugh’s travel books – for their prose, of course, and for the mingling
of comedy and tart observation that mirrors Waugh’s sensibility. Falcoff rightly
recommends the Everyman’s Library edition of Waugh Abroad: Collected Travel Writing (2003), which brings together
for the first time all seven of the travel books published by Waugh. Strictly speaking,
we can’t describe Robbery Under Law as
“travel writing,” though it’s based on Waugh’s visit to Mexico. If by that
genre we mean the work of such British writers as Charles Doughty, Rebecca West
and Patrick Leigh Fermor, Waugh’s book doesn’t make the cut, though his first
travel book, Labels (1930), and
second, Remote People (1931),
certainly do.
Robbery Under Law is no travel guide for
tourists. Waugh is less concerned with seeing the sights than with the politics of a country ruled by a corrupt, authoritarian regime. Army
Gen. Lázaro Cárdenas del Río came to power in 1934 and seized control of the
nation’s oil industry. “The Government’s campaign is against property as such,”
Waugh writes – hardly a unique development around the world in the late 1930s. Global
terror was simmering in Europe and Asia. Waugh’s book
concludes with a stirring paean to civilization that seems more pertinent than
ever:
“Civilization
has no force of its own beyond what is given it from within. It is under
constant assault and it takes most of the energies of civilised man to keep
going at all. There are criminal ideas and a criminal class in every nation and
the first action of every revolution, figuratively and literally, is to open
the prisons. Barbarism is never finally defeated; given propitious
circumstances, men and women who seem quite orderly, will commit every
conceivable atrocity. The danger does not come from merely habitual hooligans;
we are all potential recruits for anarchy. Unremitting effort is needed to keep
men living together at peace; there is only a margin of energy left over for
experiment however beneficent. Once the prisons of the mind have been opened,
the orgy is on.”
1 comment:
That's the difference between Waugh and those now in the saddle in so many of our institutions - Waugh saw opening the prisons of the mind as a reckless act, leading to anarchy, while our current insect overlords tout blowing off the doors as pure liberation, the gateway to freedom and happiness. The first view is based on a deep knowledge and understanding of history, while the second is founded on wishful thinking and airy abstractions that any reasonably intelligent fourth grader could see through. (I know - I spend all day teaching ten-year-olds. Thank God I get to work in such a sane environment!)
Post a Comment