Suddenly, there’s nothing shameful about ignorance. I mean personally, not as an indictment of the bigger culture. There’s so much I don’t know or understand, and that knowledge of my ignorance no longer bothers me very much. I still like learning things but there was a time when I had to know everything, or at least advertise that I did. I’m no longer a polymath. I was reading an autobiographical essay, “The End of Immortality,” by the American poet David Mason when I encountered this:
“I was only
nineteen, but people thought I was smart. They called me Shakespeare because I
was always reading or scribbling in a journal in downtime. I was, though, a truly
mixed up kid. Immortal, true enough, but not entirely well. A cynic about
everything . . .”
No one called
me “Shakespeare” but my step-grandfather called me “Professor,” pronounced “Perfessor.”
In a high-school creative writing class, the teacher instructed us to secretly select
another student, choose a single adjective to describe that classmate (not
physically) and share it with the class. The idea was to pick so discerningly revealing
a word that everyone would know who you were
identifying A kid I hardly knew said “critical,”
and three-quarters of the class pointed at me and called my name. Keats’ notion of “negative capability” is starting to make deep
sense, not as a literary phenomenon but as an aspect of character – “when a man
is capable of being in uncertainties, mysteries, doubts, without any irritable
reaching after fact and reason . . .” Consider the first of three definitions
of ignorance in Dr. Johnson’s Dictionary: “want of knowledge;
unlearnedness.”
I don’t mean
just “book learnin’.” Without my wife, our house would have collapsed or burned
down and we might be in debtor’s prison. I’m not gifted with many of the practical skills of daily living. Pumping
gas is the extent of my knowledge of automotive maintenance. I have friends who
pity my hopelessness – but turn me loose on King
Lear. As Johnson puts it in The Rambler: “Nothing has so exposed men
of learning to contempt and ridicule as their ignorance of things which are
known to all but themselves.”
Anthony Daniels, aka Theodore Dalrymple, writes in his essay “A Book By Its Cover”: “To think that ignorance decreases with the advance of knowledge is to mistake the nature of infinity: for infinity minus one is still infinity.”
1 comment:
The older you get, the more thing there are to be ignorant about. As the divine Philomena Cunk says, school in Shakespeare's day was easier because "they didn't have to study Shakespeare."
Post a Comment