“The words poetic and fatuous ought not to be synonyms; and to encounter a mind which is against mock society, mock poetry, mock justice, mock spirituality—against any form of enslavement—is a benefit.”
Marianne
Moore could be a soft touch when it came to reviewing. She could also be acerbic.
The passage above is her ambiguous opening sentence to a review published in
the July 12, 1936 issue of the Brooklyn
Daily Eagle. The
book in question is Rock and Shell: Poems
1923-1933 by John Wheelright (sometimes “Wheelwright”). I confused him with
John Hall Wheelock. Moore says of Wheelright:
“There is
unlooked-for wording that is not so happy; and one wonders if Mr. Wheelright
means by injustice what one means by it oneself; for his originality,
creativeness, urgency, voracity of imagination and varied reading, make his
philosophy difficult to assort. It is like a fish too strong for what has
caught it but too restricted not to be hampered by the net.”
I looked at Rock and Shell thanks to the digital
version available through the university library. Here’s a sample from the
175-line poem “Gestures to the Dead”:
“Each
Chamber of Commerce manufactures
its own
Five-Year-Plan;
a
super-power plant has shaken
the Palace
of the Vatican;
Neo-Thomists
and not engineers
should meet
in consultation,
while the
Apostolic Radio
weeps for
the Workingman.
Go on, Go
on, Slavic Boy Scouts.
Two blades
of grass grow where one grew before.
U.S.S.R. and
U.S.A. Y.M.C.A.?
Go on, Go
on, from strength to strength.”
Dreadful, isn’t it? Moore nailed it with a single adjective: “fatuous.” So bad, it’s embarrassing. It sounds remarkably contemporary, even after almost ninety years. Wheelright seems to have been a confused fellow, and not just while putting together this stuff. Winfield Townley Scott, writing in the New Mexico Quarterly in 1954, said of Wheelright:
“He was a
rebel. He was a devout Episcopalian and also he was an active member of the
Socialist Workers Party. He was a proletarian poet on Beacon Street. He was an
aristocrat and a radical artist. These seeming contradictions were certainly
not in his mind contradictions at all; the very core of his poetry is a hard
consistency of social-political-religious-beliefs.”
In 1940, at age
forty-three, he was struck and killed by a drunken driver in Boston. At the
conclusion of her review, drawing on deep wells of irony, Moore writes: “[H]e
can be daring to his own disadvantage; but if there is such a thing as modern
American poetry, these poems are part of it.”
[Moore’s
review of Wheelright’s volume is collected in The Complete Prose of Marianne Moore (ed. Patricia C. Moore,
1986).]
No comments:
Post a Comment