A reader sent me a screed against beauty he had found online. The writer wasn’t advocating its opposite, ugliness, exactly, though his prose definitely leans in that direction. Only a graduate-school alumnus could come up with such silly ideas. Rather, he seemed to be saying that beauty is an impertinence, a distraction from the important things. You can guess what they are.
I try to
avoid generalizations because men and women are by nature complicated and
even contradictory, and understanding is always contingent, but I’ve observed a
correlation between the absence of an aesthetic sense and a severe humor deficit.
Agreed: beauty is often sentimentalized. It isn’t all kitty cats and daisies (though
those things are often beautiful). In fact, it’s one of life’s great
consolations.
Days before
his death my brother pointed to the window from his hospice bed. Outside was a
black locust tree. We had one in our yard as kids. It was a sunny, breezy day
in Cleveland and the window was open. The leaves of a locust are described by
botanists as “pinnately compound” – pairs of leaflets arranged, fern-like, on a
stem. The tree was fluttering in the breeze and Ken, who was almost beyond
language, smiled and said: “Look at the tree!” It was one of the last things he
ever said.
In the March
1948 issue of Horizon, the late
William Jay Smith published a poem, “Independence Day,” with a memorable
opening:
“Life is
inadequate, but there are many real
Things
of beauty here: the flower-peddler’s cart
Adrift like
an island in the city streets,
The
peddler’s mare, lifting her mighty hoof
Aware of all
that beauty. And the slate
Where
the schoolboy draws his forty-eight
States,
ready to make room for the world.”
And then, in
the second stanza: “There are real things of beauty; all / These things were
yours.” And in the third: “There are real things of beauty / Here; and sorrow
is our praise.”
No comments:
Post a Comment