“The major writers in whose shadows I grow my mushrooms are Osip Mandelstam, Donald Barthelme, Robert Walser, and Walter Savage Landor.”
Writers are not always
reliable interpreters of their own work, or even willing or able to identify
their influences. The impact might be subconscious. Sometimes,
naming influences is a protective act. There’s strength in numbers, yes, but
also in quality. In the interview quoted above, Guy Davenport offers an
unlikely assortment, from a master like Mandelstam to a bric-a-brac-monger like
Barthelme. Guy was passionately curious, learned and generous with what he knew,
so we pay addition when he lauds a writer’s work.
Of few writers can we say
to a novice: You can’t go wrong; start anywhere and enjoy yourself. Even
Shakespeare wrote Titus Andronicus. In my experience, even after almost
half a century, I reliably enjoy and learn something from Guy’s work, no matter
how remote it may seem from my interests. On my shelves sit twenty-five volumes
of his work. In his essay “Ernst Mach Max Ernest” (The Geography of the Imagination,
1981), Guy names writers with “the styles I find most useful to study”: Hugh Kenner,
Mandelstam, Beckett, Wyndham Lewis, Pound and Charles Doughty. He says of them:
“All of these are writers who do not waste a word, who condense, pare down, and
proceed with daring synapses.” Again, one can quibble. Pound? Really? But it
was Guy who introduced me to Doughty, author of Travels in Arabia Deserta, an
essential book in my library.
The most intriguing name cited
by Guy is Landor. I know of no other allusion to the author of Imaginary
Conversations in his work. Landor as shadow for Guy’s own work
makes sense. He was a classicist, like Guy, and wrote much of his poetry in
Latin. Here is “Memory,” a poem I hadn’t encountered before, one I
think Guy might have appreciated:
“The mother of the Muses,
we are taught,
Is Memory: she has left
me; they remain,
And shake my shoulder,
urging me to sing
About the summer days, my
loves of old.
Alas! alas! is all I can
reply.
Memory has left with me
that name alone,
Harmonious name, which
other bards may sing,
But her bright image in my
darkest hour
Comes back, in vain comes
back, called or uncalled.
Forgotten are the names of
visitors
Ready to press my hand but
yesterday;
Forgotten are the names of
earlier friends
Whose genial converse and glad countenance
Are fresh as ever to mine ear and eye;
To these, when I have
written, and besought
Remembrance of me, the
word Dear alone
Hangs on the upper verge,
and waits in vain.
A blessing wert thou, O
oblivion,
If thy stream carried only
weeds away,
But vernal and autumnal
flowers alike
It hurries down to wither
on the strand.”
Guy leaves no clues as to
why he prizes Landor. Perhaps he numbered him among “earlier friends / Whose
genial converse and glad countenance / Are fresh as ever to mine ear and eye .
. .”
No comments:
Post a Comment