I’ve never
been certain how far outside a small circle of Eastern academics interest in
Melville spread in those early years. When did bookstores and libraries routinely
begin stocking Moby-Dick? When, among
non-academic readers, was it judged an “American classic” and recognized as
chief among our contributions to world literature? One early reader was Oliver
Wendell Holmes Jr., then an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the
United States. In the Holmes-Laski
Letters (ed. Mark DeWolfe Howe, Harvard University Press, 1953), he writes
to Harold Laski on April 14, 1921:
“Did I
mention my revelation . . . ? Herman Melville and Moby Dick—an account of sperm whaling with a story superadded.
Anyhow I have finished it now and can say more certainly than ever that, with
longueurs, it is, yet, I think, a mighty book.”
Is Holmes
purposely echoing Ishmael’s boast in Chapter 104, “The Fossil Whale”: “To
produce a mighty book, you must choose a mighty theme”? He seems intuitively to
understand Melville's principal influence and the grandeur of his
ambition:
“Not
Shakespeare had more feeling of the mystery of the world and of life. There are
mountain peaks and chasms and – the whole is as thick with life at first hand
now as the day it was written – as Hawthorne’s Scarlet Letter seemed to me thin, 20 years ago. (W. James replied
to me when I said so, Because it is an original book.)”
Let’s
applaud Holmes’ recognition that Hawthorne is “thin.” The Scarlett Letter may be the most overrated book in the American canon.
Tedious stuff. Holmes continues:
“Incidentally,
it pleases me that he takes his fellow-sailors, a cannibal, an Indian, a negro and
old Nantucket mates and captain with the same unconscious seriousness that
common men would reserve for Presidents and Prime Ministers. And my, but he
nobly exalts the Nantucket Whalemen, the Macys, the Coffins and the rest. I don’t
want to say too much but if you like George Borrow as I do I think this is a
bigger man.”
I’m not convinced
by the Borrow comparison but Holmes, to his credit, recognizes Melville’s very
American, very democratic impulses.
No comments:
Post a Comment