“Churchill’s reading programme began with Edward Gibbon’s
4,000-page The Decline and Fall of the
Roman Empire -- which he was to re-read twice more over the course of his
life, and parts of which he could quote from memory. He followed it with Gibbon’s
autobiography and then read Macaulay’s six-volume History of England, which he loved (except for the attacks on the 1st
Duke of Marlborough) and the Lays of
Ancient Rome. After that he read Jowett’s translation of Plato’s Republic, and the key texts of
Schopenhauer, Malthus, Darwin, Adam Smith [and so forth].”
Roberts notes that though “the sheer breadth of
his reading was astonishing,” Churchill read no novels. Odd, given that the
novel was reaching its peak of literary supremacy just before and during his
lifetime. Churchill’s ambitious and highly idiosyncratic reading resulted in
the inevitable spottiness that can afflict the self-taught:
“[His] autodidacticism meant that there were
inevitable gaps in his knowledge. As late as 1906 he had not heard of Keats’s ‘Ode
to a Nightingale,’ and he confused the poet William Blake with the admiral
Robert Blake. But once this was pointed out, a friend recorded, ‘the next time
I met him, he had learned not merely this, but all the odes of Keats by heart –
and he recited them to me mercilessly from start to finish, not sparing me a syllable!’”
On Friday, I mentioned to an electrical engineer I
work with that Abraham Lincoln is the only American president to hold a patent.
While navigating flatboats on the Mississippi River, he devised a device for “buoying
vessels over shoals.” My colleague said,
“I had no idea that Lincoln had a mechanical bent.” Today, we’re astonished that before our age of specialization and advanced degrees, people often possessed
multiple gifts, any one of which might sustain a career today. Churchill, of course, won the Nobel Prize for Literature in 1953 "for his mastery of historical and biographical description as well as for brilliant oratory in defending exalted human values."
2 comments:
Jason Emerson has written an compact account of Lincoln's invention, 'Lincoln the Inventor' (Southern Illinois University Press, 2009)
I recommend the 1860 Scientific Annal; which Lincoln recommended when it came out. If you have a mechanical turn, or if you just like reading about neat tech circa 1860.
Post a Comment